4.5 Article

Unbalanced synaptic inhibition can create intensity-tuned auditory cortex neurons

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 146, Issue 1, Pages 449-462

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.01.019

Keywords

nonmonotonic; whole-cell; timing; feature selectivity

Categories

Funding

  1. NIDCD NIH HHS [DC002260, R01 DC002260] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [P50 MH077970] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [NS34835, R01 NS010414] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intensity-tuned auditory cortex neurons have spike rates that are nonmonotonic functions of sound intensity: their spike rate initially increases and peaks as sound intensity is increased, then decreases as sound intensity is further increased. They are either unbalanced, receiving disproportionally large synaptic inhibition at high sound intensities; or balanced, receiving intensity-tuned synaptic excitation and identically tuned synaptic inhibition which neither creates enhances nor creates intensity-tuning. It has remained unknown if the synaptic inhibition received by unbalanced neurons enhances intensity-tuning already present in the synaptic excitation, or if it creates intensity-tuning that is not present in the synaptic excitation. Here we show, using in vivo whole cell recordings in pentobarbital-anesthetized rats, that in some unbalanced intensity-tuned auditory cortex neurons synaptic inhibition enhances the intensity-tuning; while in others it actually creates the intensity-tuning. The lack of balance between synaptic excitation and inhibition was not always apparent in their peak amplitudes, but could sometimes be revealed only by considering their relative timing. Since synaptic inhibition is essentially cortical in origin, the unbalanced neurons in which inhibition creates intensity-tuning provide examples of auditory feature-selectivity arising de novo at the auditory cortex. (C) 2007 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available