4.3 Article

Divergent response of metabolite transport proteins in human skeletal muscle after sprint interval training and detraining

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00503.2006

Keywords

GLUT4; monocarboxylate transporters; fatty acid translocase; plasma membrane fatty acid binding protein

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Skeletal muscle primarily relies on carbohydrate (CHO) for energy provision during high-intensity exercise. We hypothesized that sprint interval training (SIT), or repeated sessions of high-intensity exercise, would induce rapid changes in transport proteins associated with CHO metabolism, whereas changes in skeletal muscle fatty acid transporters would occur more slowly. Eight active men (22 +/- 1 yr; peak oxygen uptake = 50 +/- 2 ml(.)kg(-1.)min(-1)) performed 4-6 X 30 s all-out cycling efforts with 4-min recovery, 3 days/wk for 6 wk. Needle muscle biopsy samples (vastus lateralis) were obtained before training (Pre), after I and 6 wk of SIT, and after I and 6 wk of detraining. Muscle oxidative capacity, as reflected by the protein content of cytochrome c oxidase subunit 4 (COX4), increased by similar to 35% after 1 wk of SIT and remained higher compared with Pre, even after 6 wk of detraining (P < 0.05). Muscle GLUT4 content increased after I wk of SIT and remained -20% higher compared with baseline during detraining (P < 0.05). The monocarboxylate tranporter (MCT) 4 was higher after I and 6 wk of SIT compared with Pre, whereas MCTI increased after 6 wk of training and remained higher after I wk of detraining (P < 0.05). There was no effect of training or detraining on the muscle content of fatty acid translocase (FAT/CD36) or plasma membrane associated fatty acid binding protein (FABPpm) (P > 0.05). We conclude that short-term SIT induces rapid increases in skeletal muscle oxidative capacity but has divergent effects on proteins associated with glucose, lactate, and fatty acid transport.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available