4.5 Article

Specific real-time polymerase chain reaction places Kingella kingae as the most common cause of osteoarticular infections in young children

Journal

PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages 377-381

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.inf.0000259954.88139.f4

Keywords

children; Kingella kingae; specific real-time PCR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The use of universal 16S rDNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has recently shown that the place of Kingella kingae in osteoarticular infections (OAI) in young children has been underestimated, but this technique is not the most sensitive or the most rapid method for molecular diagnosis. We developed a specific real-time PCR method to detect K. kingae DNA and applied it to the etiologic diagnosis of OAL. Patients and Methods: All children admitted to a pediatric unit for OAT between January 2004 and December 2005 were enrolled in this prospective study. Culture-negative osteoarticular specimens were tested by 16S rDNA PCR and by K. kingae-specific real-time PCR when sufficient sample remained. Results: By culture alo ie, a pathogen was identified in 45% of the 131 specimens tested (Staphylococcus aureus, n = 25; K. kingae, n = 17; others, n = 18). 16S rDNA PCR and K. kingae-specific PCR were both applied to 61 of the culture-negative samples. The combination of culture and 16S rDNA PCR identified a pathogen in 61% of cases (K. kingae DNA, n = 16; DNA of other microorganisms, n = 5). Specific real-time PCR identified a further 6 cases caused by K. kingae and confirmed all 16 universal PCR-positive cases, bringing the overall documentation rate to 66%. K. kingae was the leading cause of OAT in this podiatric series (n = 39, 45%), followed by S. aureus (n = 25, 29%) Conclusion: The K. kingae-specific real-time PCR places K. kingae as the leading cause of OAI in children at our hospital.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available