4.6 Article

Sex-specific and exercise-acquired cardioprotection is abolished by sarcolemmal KATP channel blockade in the rat heart

Journal

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.01301.2006

Keywords

ischemia; infarction; sex differences; gender

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL 72790] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study was conducted to determine whether the infarct sparing effect of shortterm exercise is dependent on the operation of the myocardial sarcolemmal ATP-sensitive K+ (K-ATP) channel. Adult male and female Sprague-Dawley rats were exercised on a motorized treadmill for 5 days. Twenty-four hours following the training or sedentary period, hearts were isolated and exposed to 1 h of regional ischemia followed by 2 h of reperfusion on a modified Langendorf apparatus in the presence or absence of the sarcolemmal K-ATP channel antagonist HMR-1098 (30 mu M). Following the ischemia-reperfusion protocol, infarct size was determined as a percentage of the total ischemic zone at risk (ZAR). Short-term exercise reduced infarct size by 24% in males (32 +/- 2% of ZAR; P < 0.01) and by 18% in females (26 +/- 2% of ZAR; P < 0.05). Sarcolemmal K-ATP channel blockade abolished the training-induced cardioprotection in both males and females, increasing infarct size to 43 +/- 3% and 52 +/- 4% of ZAR, respectively. In the absence of HMR-1098, infarct size was significantly lower in sedentary females than in males (33 +/- 4% vs. 42 +/- 2% of ZAR, respectively; P < 0.01). However, the presence of HMR-1098 abolished this sex difference, increasing infarct size by 58% in the sedentary females (P < 0.01) but having no effect on infarct size in sedentary males. This study demonstrates that the sex-specific and exercise-acquired resistance to myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury is dependent on sarcolemmal K-ATP activitv during ischemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available