4.6 Article

Redistribution of Pulmonary Blood Flow Impacts Thermodilution-based Extravascular Lung Water Measurements in a Model of Acute Lung Injury

Journal

ANESTHESIOLOGY
Volume 111, Issue 5, Pages 1065-1074

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181bc99cf

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland [HL64368, HL073994]
  2. Foundation for Anesthesia Education and Research, Rochester, Minnesota

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Studies using transthoracic thermodilution have demonstrated increased extravascular lung water (EVLW) measurements attributed to progression of edema and flooding during sepsis and acute lung Injury. The authors hypothesized that redistribution of pulmonary blood flow can cause increased apparent EVLW secondary to increased perfusion of thermally silent tissue, not increased lung edema. Methods. Anesthetized, mechanically ventilated canines were instrumented with PiCCO(R) (Pulsion Medical, Munich, Germany) catheters and underwent lung injury by repetitive saline lavage. Hemodynamic and respiratory physiologic data were recorded. After stabilized lung injury, endotoxin was administered to inactivate hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. Computed tomographic imaging was performed to quantify in vivo lung volume, total tissue (fluid) and air content, and regional distribution of blood flow. Results. Lavage injury caused an Increase In airway pressures and decreased arterial oxygen content with minimal hemodynamic effects. EVLW and shunt fraction increased after injury and then markedly after endotoxin administration. Computed tomographic measurements quantified an endotoxin-Induced increase in pulmonary blood flow to poorly aerated regions with no change in total lung tissue volume. Conclusions. The abrupt increase in EVLW and shunt fraction after endotoxin administration is consistent with inactivation of

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available