4.7 Article

Molecular glass wool filtration as a new tool for sperm preparation

Journal

HUMAN REPRODUCTION
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages 1405-1412

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dem015

Keywords

annexin V; apoptosis marker; glass wool; IVF; sperm

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) using annexin V-conjugated microbeads in a liquid phase eliminates apoptotic spermatozoa based on the externalization of phosphatidylserine (EPS) residues. The procedure allows the enrichment of a sperm population free of apoptosis markers, giving higher fertilization potential. Our aim was to determine if the annexin V binding principle can be transferred onto a glass wool filter system in order to produce a solid phase filter. METHODS: Semen samples (n = 42) were subjected to a molecular glass wool filter system using glass surfaces coated with annexin V and compared with aliquots separated by conventional glass wool, as well as with annexin V-MACS. The extent of apoptosis was assessed by measuring levels of activated caspase 3 using fluorescein-labelled inhibitors of caspase, alterations in mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) using a lipophilic cationic dye, and EPS using a fluorescein isothiocyanate-coupled monoclonal antibody. RESULTS: Annexin V-negative sperm filtered out by the newly developed molecular glass wool filtration (GWF) system displayed superior quality in terms of high MMP integrity, as well as, to a small extent, caspase 3 activation and EPS. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of traditional GWF can be further improved by combination with annexin V binding. This newly developed solid phase molecular filter system has been proven to enrich spermatozoa free of apoptosis markers to the same extent as the annexin V magnetic separation technique. The selection of spermatozoa free of apoptosis markers by molecular glass wool filters may enhance the results of IVF.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available