4.1 Article

Duloxetine as an SNRI treatment for generalized anxiety disorder: results from a placebo and active-controlled trial

Journal

INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages 167-174

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e32807fb1b2

Keywords

anxiolytic; duloxetine; generalized anxiety disorder; placebo; venlafaxine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the efficacy and tolerability of duloxetine 60-120 mg/day for the treatment of patients with generalized anxiety disorder. This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, flexible-dose, placebo and active-controlled (venlafaxine extended-release 75-225mg/day) trial designed to assess duloxetine 60-120 mg/day during 10 weeks of treatment in adults with Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders-IV-defined generalized anxiety disorder. The primary efficacy outcome measure was mean change from baseline to endpoint in the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale total score assessed using analysis of covariance. A total of 487 patients were randomly assigned to duloxetine (n = 162), venlafaxine XR (n = 164), or placebo (n = 161). Significantly greater improvement on the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale total score occurred in the duloxetine (P=0.007) and venlafaxine XR (P < 0.001) groups compared with the placebo group. Overall discontinuation rates did not differ among the three groups, but adverse event-related discontinuation was significantly higher in the duloxetine (14.2%, P < 0.001) and venlafaxine XR (11.0%, P=0.001) groups than in the placebo group 1.9%). During the 2-week drug-tapering phase, discontinuation emergent adverse events were significantly greater in the venlafaxine XR group (26.9%, P=0.04), but not in the duloxetine group (19.4%, P= 0.448) compared with placebo (15.8%). Duloxetine 60-120 mg/day and venlafaxine XR 75-225 mg/day were each efficacious treatments for patients with generalized anxiety disorder.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available