4.7 Article

Clinical usefulness of serum EBV DNA levels of BamHI W and LMP1 for nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
Volume 79, Issue 5, Pages 562-572

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.20853

Keywords

nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma; Epstein-Barr virus; quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction; BamHI W; LMP1

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was utilized to measure serum EBV DNA levels of BamHI W fragment and latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) in 20 nasal natural killer (NK)/T-cell lymphoma patients. Both serum EBV DNAs were detected at high levels in all patients, but the levels were below the limit of detection in all healthy controls. The BamHI Z fragment, Epstein-Barr-replication activator (ZEBRA) expression was detected in a small proportion (0.1-3%) of lymphoma cells from 10 (50%) of the patients. Patients with ZEBRA expression showed significantly higher DNA levels of BamHI W and LMP1 (P=0.0081, P=0.004), suggesting that EBV DNA may be caused by EBV replication from lymphoma cells. Kaplan-Meier and univariate analyses revealed that high DNA levels of BamHI W and LMP1 at pre-treatment and high BamHI W DNA level at post-treatment were associated with short disease-free survival and overall survival (P < 0.05, each). Although the DNA levels of BamHI W and LMP1 correlated significantly, their dynamics were not always parallel. Patients with low pre-treatment level of both EBV DNAs showed a favorable course, in contrast to patients with high pre-treatment level of both EBV DNAs who showed an aggressive course (P=0.0085). More importantly, the high pre-treatment level of both EBV DNAs was determined as the only independent prognostic factor among various prognostic factors. These data suggest that simultaneous measurement of serum levels of both BamHI W and LMP1 DNAs may be useful for diagnosis, disease monitoring, and prediction of prognosis for nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available