4.7 Article

Meeting report: Alternatives for developmental neurotoxicity testing

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
Volume 115, Issue 5, Pages 764-768

Publisher

US DEPT HEALTH HUMAN SCIENCES PUBLIC HEALTH SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.9841

Keywords

alternatives; developmental neurotoxicity testing; humane science; in vitro models; policy; regulatory acceptance; screening; TestSmart; the 3Rs; validation

Funding

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [R13 ES014772] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Developmental neurotoxicity testing (DNT) is perceived by many stakeholders to be an area in critical need of alternatives to current animal testing protocols and guidelines. To address this need, the Johns Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the National Toxicology Program are collaborating in a program called TestSmart DNT, the goals of which are to: (a) develop alternative methodologies for identifying and prioritizing chemicals and exposures that may cause developmental neurotoxicity in humans; (b) develop the policies for incorporating DNT alternatives into regulatory decision making; and (c) identify opportunities for reducing, refining, or replacing the use of animals in DNT. The first TestSmart DNT workshop was an open registration meeting held 13-15 March 2006 in Reston, Virginia. The primary objective was to bring together stakeholders (test developers, test users, regulators, and advocate,3 for children's health, animal welfare, and environmental health) and individuals representing diverse disciplines (developmental neurobiology, toxicology, policy, and regulatory science) from around the world to share information and concerns relating to the science and policy of DNT. Individual presentations are available at the CAAT TestSmart website. This report provides a synthesis of workgroup, discussions and recommendations for future directions and priorities, which include initiating a systematic evaluation of alternative models and technologies, developing a framework for the creation of an open database to catalog DNT data, and devising a strategy fot harmonizing the validation process across international jurisdictional borders. Key words: alternatives, developmental neurotoxicity testing, humane science, in vitro models, policy, regulatory acceptance, screening, TestSmart, the 3Rs, validation. Environ Health Perspect 115:764-768 (2007).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available