4.1 Article

Development of formulae for accurate measurement of the glomerular filtration rate by renal dynamic imaging

Journal

NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages 407-413

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e3280a02f8b

Keywords

glomerular filtration rate; renal dynamic imaging; two-plasma method

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim Currently, the widely adopted renal dynamic imaging in clinical practice uses Gates' method to calculate the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), but many researchers have proven that Gates' method may result in bias. Thus, this article explores alternative improved formulae to calculate GFR by renal dynamic imaging. Methods Three hundred and sixty-seven patients were selected and their GFR values were measured using renal dynamic imaging and the two-plasma method with Tc-99m-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Tc-99m-DTPA) as the imaging agent. With the two-plasma GFR as reference value, two equations were obtained from linear and nonlinear regression analyses between the renal uptake percentage and two-plasma GFR. The 367 patients were divided into two random groups, with the first group used to derive the regression formulae and the second to verify the formulae. Finally, all patients were studied to derive the formulae to calculate GFR. The comparison of our formulae with the commonly used Gates' formula was conducted by the Bland-Altman method. Results The linear and non-linear GFR formulae were as follows: GFR (ml/min/1.73 m(2)) = (631.633 x renal uptake percentage - 2.040) x 1.73/BSA (BSA, body surface area) and GFR (ml/min/1.73 m(2)) = (- 1996.585 x renal uptake percentage(2) + 1013.526 x renal uptake percentage - 12.739) x 1.73/BSA, respectively. The biases of the GFR values calculated using the linear and non-linear formulae and Gates' formula relative to the two-plasma GFR were - 2.5 +/- 19.1 ml/min/1.73 m(2), - 2.0 +/- 19.3 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and 3.4 +/- 19.4ml/min/1.73 m(2), respectively. Conclusions The GFR values calculated using our new formulae correlate better with the reference GFR value than does GFR calculated by Gates' formula, and the GFR values measured using the non-linear formula are more accurate than those obtained using the linear formula. Nucl Med Commun 28:407-413 (c) 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available