4.7 Article

Epidemiology of distal symmetrical neuropathies in the Italian elderly

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 68, Issue 18, Pages 1460-1467

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000260606.36443.29

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To estimate prevalence and incidence of distal symmetric neuropathies ( DSN) in the Italian elderly, and to evaluate the accuracy of our procedure to screen for DSN. Methods: In eight Italian municipalities, a population-based sample was directly evaluated both at baseline ( 1992) and after a 3-year follow-up. Cohort members who had died were studied. DSN diagnosis and subtyping were made according to specified diagnostic criteria. Results: Our screening procedure proved accurate ( sensitivity 94.7%, specificity 70%, positive predictive value 18.9%), and provided an adjusted prevalence of 7.0 ( 95% CI, 6.9 to 7.0). Women outnumber men both in the oldest age groups and as a whole. Rates increase with increasing age in both genders. Among the 2,845 individuals re- screened at the follow-up and the 221 deceased subjects with reliable information, we identified 100 incident cases of DSN. Adjusted annual incidence rate ( per 1,000 person-years) in the population 65 to 84 years of age is 7.9 ( 95% CI, 6.3 to 9.5), and for the nondiabetic DSN is 5.76 ( 95% CI, 4.3 to 7.3). Age significantly predicted the onset of DSN both in diabetic individuals ( for every increasing year of age RR = 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.14) and in the entire study population ( RR = 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.09). Conclusions: We provide the first population- based distal symmetric neuropathies incidence data, as well as prevalence rates from an unselected sample of Italian elderly. Distal symmetric neuropathies are an age- associated condition, but the frequency of diabetic distal symmetric neuropathies declines with age, coincident with an increase in nondiabetic cases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available