4.5 Article

Enhanced binding affinity for FcγRIIIa of fucose-negative antibody is sufficient to induce maximal antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity

Journal

MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 12, Pages 3122-3131

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2007.02.005

Keywords

antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC); Fc gamma RIIIa; NK cell; fucose

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) is considered to be an important therapeutic function for clinical efficacy of monoclonal antibodies. Recent studies have revealed two methods to increase binding affinity for Fc-yRIIIa and enhance ADCC more efficiently for antibodies: (i) fucose removal from antibody N-linked complex oligosaccharides and (ii) amino acid mutations in the antibody Fc region. In this study, we compare the biological activities of the methods of generating high ADCC antibodies. We used a fucose-negative antibody and two antibodies with sets of mutations, demonstrated previously to optimally enhance ADCC using the chimeric anti-CD20 antibody, rituximab, as the model. Both amino acid mutant antibodies showed a significantly higher affinity for recombinant Fc-yRIIIa than fucose-negative antibody when compared using biosensor analysis. The removal of fucose from the antibodies bearing amino acid mutations exhibited a further enhancement of binding to recombinant Fc-gamma RIIIa and significantly increased binding to natural killer (NK) cells. Despite the differences manifested in binding for the Fc gamma R, ADCCs were indistinguishable between methods and even when the methods were combined. These results indicate that the affinity of binding to Fc gamma RIIIa does not predict ADCC beyond a certain threshold and that each method alone is sufficient to induce maximal ADCC of the antibody. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available