4.6 Article

Weak lensing mass reconstruction of the galaxy cluster Abell 209

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 467, Issue 2, Pages 427-436

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066994

Keywords

gravitational lensing; galaxies : clusters : individual : Abell 209

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context. Weak lensing applied to deep optical images of clusters of galaxies provides a powerful tool to reconstruct the distribution of the gravitating mass associated to these structures. Aims. We use the shear signal extracted by an analysis of deep exposures of a region centered around the galaxy cluster ABCG209, at redshift z similar to 0.2, to derive both a map of the projected mass distribution and an estimate of the total mass within a characteristic radius. Methods. We use a series of deep archival R-band images from CFHT- 12k, covering an area of similar to 0.3 deg(2). We determine the shear of background galaxy images using a new implementation of the modified Kaiser-Squires-Broadhurst KSB+ pipeline for shear determination, which we has been tested against the Shear TEsting Program 1 and 2 '' simulations. We use mass aperture statistics to produce maps of the 2 dimensional density distribution, and parametric fits using both Navarro-Frenk- White and singular-isothermal-sphere profiles to constrain the total mass. Results. The projected mass distribution shows a pronounced asymmetry, with an elongated structure extending from the SE to the NW. This is in general agreement with the optical distribution previously found by other authors. A similar elongation was previously detected in the X-ray emission map, and in the distribution of galaxy colours. The circular NFW mass profile fit gives a total mass of M-200 = 7.7(-2.7)(+4.3) x 10(14) M-circle dot inside the virial radius r(200) = 1.8 +/- 0.3 Mpc. Conclusions. The weak lensing profile reinforces the evidence for an elongated structure of ABCG209, as previously suggested by studies of the galaxy distribution and velocities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available