4.7 Article

Yield stress and viscosity equations for mortars and self-consolidating concrete

Journal

CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH
Volume 37, Issue 5, Pages 655-670

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.02.009

Keywords

temperature (A); fresh concrete (A); high range water reducers (D); rheology (A); calorimetty (A)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The theological behavior of flowable concrete, such as self consolidating concrete is closely influenced by concreting temperature and the elapsed time. The variation of the plastic viscosity and the yield stress with the elapsed time and temperature must be accurately quantified in order to forecast the variation of workability of cement-based materials. A convenient method to study the variation of these theological parameters is proposed, using the mortar of the concrete. This latter is designed from the concrete mixture, taking in account the liquid and solid phases with a maximum granulometry of 315 mu m. Different SCC and mortars proportioned with two types of high range water reducing admixtures (HRWRA) were prepared at temperatures ranging from 10 to 33 degrees C. Test results indicates that the yield stress and the plastic viscosity of the mortar mixtures vary in a linear way with the elapsed time while an exponential variation of these theological parameter is seen on SCC. In order to enhance robotization of concrete, general equations to predict the variations of the yield stress and plastic viscosity with time are proposed, using the corresponding mortar initial yield stress and plastic viscosity. Such equations, derived from existing models, can easily be employed to develop concrete design software. Experimental constants which are related to the paste fluidity or the aggregates proportioning can be extracted from a database created with either mortar or aggregates test results. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available