4.6 Article

Free cortisol in sepsis and septic shock

Journal

ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA
Volume 106, Issue 6, Pages 1813-1819

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318172fdba

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Severe sepsis activates the hypothalamopituitary axis, increasing cortisol production. In some studies, hydrocortisone substitution based on an adrenocorticotropic hormone-stimulation test or baseline cortisol measurement has improved outcome. Because only the free fraction of cortisol is active, measurement of free cortisol may be more important than total cortisol in critically ill patients. We measured total and free cortisol in patients with severe sepsis and related the concentrations to outcome. METHODS: In a prospective study, severe sepsis was defined according the American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine criteria. Blood samples were drawn within 24 h of study entry. Serum cortisol was analyzed by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. The Coolens method was used for calcutating serum free cortisol concentrations. RESULTS: Blood samples were collected from 125 patients, of whom 62 had severe sepsis and 63 septic shock. Hospital mortality was 21%. Calculated free serum cortisol correlated well with serum total cortisol (r = 0.90, P < 0.001). There was no difference in the total cortisol concentrations in patients with sepsis and septic shock (728 386 nmol/L vs 793 +/- 439 nmol/L, P = 0.44). Nonsurvivors had higher calculated serum free (209 +/- 151 nmol/L) and total (980 +/- 458 nmol/L) cortisol concentrations than survivors (119 +/- 111 nmol/L, P = 0.002, and 704 +/- 383 nmol/L, P = 0.002). Depending on the definition, the incidence of adrenal insufficiency varied from 8% to 54%. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically, calculation of free cortisol does not provide essential information for identification of patients who would benefit from corticoid treatment in severe sepsis and septic shock.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available