4.5 Article

Targeted high-efficiency, homogeneous myocardial gene transfer

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR CARDIOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 5, Pages 954-961

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2007.02.004

Keywords

gene therapy; myocytes; capillary permeability; regional blood flow

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL067148-05, R01 HL067148, R01 HL093486] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIBIB NIH HHS [R01 EB002846, R01 EB002846-04] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Myocardial gene therapy continues to show promise as a tool for investigation and treatment of cardiac disease. Progress toward clinical approval has been slowed by limited in vivo delivery methods. We investigated the problem in a porcine model, with an objective of developing a method for high efficiency, homogeneous myocardial gene transfer that could be used in large mammals, and ultimately in humans. Eighty-one piglets under-went coronary catheterization for delivery of viral vectors into the left anterior descending artery and/or the great cardiac vein. The animals were followed for 5 or 28 days, and then transgene efficiency was quantified from histological samples. The baseline protocol included treatment with VEGF, nitroglycerin, and adenosine followed by adenovirus infusion into the LAD. Gene transfer efficiency varied with choice of viral vector, with use of VEGF, adenosine, or nitroglycerin, and with calcium concentration. The best results were obtained by manipulation of physical parameters. Simultaneous infusion of adenovirus through both left anterior descending artery and great cardiac vein resulted in gene transfer to 78 +/- 6% of myocytes in a larger target area. This method was well tolerated by the animals. We demonstrate targeted, homogeneous, high efficiency gene transfer using a method that should be transferable for eventual human usage. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available