4.5 Article

Microarray analyses in dendritic cells reveal potential biomarkers for chemical-induced skin sensitization

Journal

MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 12, Pages 3222-3233

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2007.01.031

Keywords

dendritic cells; sensitization; microarray

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA68485] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NEI NIH HHS [P30 EY08126] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NHLBI NIH HHS [1 P01 HL6744-01] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDDK NIH HHS [P60 DK20593, P30 DK58404] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The assessment of the skin sensitising capacity of chemicals is up to now investigated using in vivo animal tests. However there has been an increasing public and governmental concern regarding the use of animals for chemical screening. This has raised the need for the development of validated in vitro alternatives. Langerhans cells are potent antigen-presenting cells that play a crucial role in the development of allergic contact dermatitis. We used CD34(+) progenitor-derived dendritic cells from cord blood as an in vitro alternative for Langerhans cells. The cells were exposed to four contact allergens (nickel sulphate, dinitrochlorobenzene, oxazolone and eugenol) and two irritants (sodium dodecyl sulphate and benzalkonium chloride) for 3, 6, 12 and 24 h. Using microarray analyses we revealed a set of 25 genes with an altered gene expression pattern after exposure to allergens and not to irritants. Five out of these 25 genes were selected and their gene expression changes were confirmed with real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. The list of 25 genes represent valuable candidates to be further evaluated for their capacity to predict the sensitizing potential of different classes of chemicals in studies using a more extended set of (non) allergic substances. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available