4.7 Article

El Nino in a coupled climate model: Sensitivity to changes in mean state induced by heat flux and wind stress corrections

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages 2273-2298

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI4111.1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [ncas10009] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Here the factors affecting the mean state and El Nino variability in the Third Hadley Centre Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere General Circulation Model (HadCM3) are examined with and without heat flux or wind stress corrections. There is currently little confidence in the prediction of El Nino for seasonal forecasts or climate change due to the inaccuracies in coupled models. If heat flux or wind stress corrections could reduce these biases then forecasts might be improved. Heat flux corrections have unexpected effects on both the mean state and variability of HadCM3. HadCM3 is found to be very sensitive to the corrections imposed. If heat flux corrections are imposed Tropics wide then easterlies in the eastern equatorial Pacific are increased leading to localized steep east-west gradients in the thermocline or thermocline jumps, which appear to suppress propagation of heat from the west to the east and hence suppress strong El Ninos so that ENSO variability is weak. In contrast, if heat flux corrections are imposed only within 10 of the equator, an atmospheric teleconnection from the cold subtropical SST biases intensifies the ITCZ and weakens the equatorial easterlies. As a result, the thermocline jumps are flattened and strong El Ninos occur very frequently. Neither heat flux correction procedure improves the representation of El Nino. Wind stress corrections alone have a small impact on the coupled model. Some of the SST warm biases are reduced, but the variability is not altered significantly.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available