4.7 Review

Peptides and proteins used to enhance gold nanoparticle delivery to the brain: preclinical approaches

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NANOMEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages 4919-4936

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S82310

Keywords

blood-brain barrier; central nervous system; transcytosis; drug delivery; EPR effect; biodistribution

Funding

  1. FONDECYT [11130494, 1130425]
  2. FONDAP [15130011]
  3. UNAB [DI569-14/R]
  4. MECESUP [UCH-0811]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An exciting and emerging field in nanomedicine involves the use of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) in the preclinical development of new strategies for the treatment and diagnosis of brain-related diseases such as neurodegeneration and cerebral tumors. The treatment of many brain-related disorders with AuNPs, which possess useful physical properties, is limited by the blood-brain barrier (BBB). The BBB highly regulates the substances that can permeate into the brain. Peptides and proteins may represent promising tools to improve the delivery of AuNPs to the central nervous system (CNS). In this review, we summarize the potential applications of AuNPs to CNS disorders, discuss different strategies based on the use of peptides or proteins to improve the delivery of AuNPs to the brain, and examine the intranasal administration route, which bypasses the BBB. We also analyze the potential neurotoxicity of AuNPs and the perspectives and new challenges concerning the use of peptides and proteins to enhance the delivery of AuNPs to the brain. The majority of the work described in this review is in a preclinical stage of experimentation, or in select cases, in clinical trials in humans. We note that the use of AuNPs still requires substantial study before being translated into human applications. However, for further clinical research, the issues related to the potential use of AuNPs must be analyzed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available