4.6 Article

Methylation profile in benign, borderline and malignant ovarian tumors

Journal

JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 133, Issue 5, Pages 331-341

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-006-0178-5

Keywords

methylation profile; ovarian tumors; tumor suppressor genes; concurrent methylation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Promoter hypermethylation is a common phenomenon in neoplasm. The aims of this study were (a) to compare the methylation profiles in different types of ovarian tumors and (b) to determine the possible relationship between the methylation status and different clinicopathologic characteristics. Methods We examined the promoter methylation status of 9 tumor suppressor genes (RAR beta 2, TMS1, RIZ1, P15, P16, PTEN, MINT31, APC and HIC1) in 89 ovarian cancers, 16 borderline ovarian tumors, 19 benign ovarian tumors, 16 normal ovarian tissue and 5 ovarian cancer cell lines. The methylation status was examined with respect to clinicopathologic characteristics of the ovarian cancer patients. Results Methylation indices for ovarian cancer, borderline ovarian tumor, benign ovarian tumor, normal ovarian tissue and ovarian cancer cell lines were 28.8, 20.1, 10.5, 11.8 and 42.2%, respectively. It was significantly higher in ovarian cancer, borderline ovarian tumor and ovarian cancer cell lines (X-2 test, P < 0.001, P = 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively) than benign or normal ovarian tissues. In ovarian cancer, concurrent methylation of at least two genes (CM2) was associated with early stage disease (X-2 test, P = 0.035) and less recurrence (X-2 test, P = 0.020). When the methylation statuses of the nine genes as well as CM2 were included in multivariate Cox Regression analysis, CM2 was the only independent predictor for survival (P = 0.013). Conclusion CM2 was an independent predictor for survival in ovarian cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available