4.5 Article

Linear stability of radially-heated circular Couette flow with simulated radial gravity

Journal

ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ANGEWANDTE MATHEMATIK UND PHYSIK
Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages 431-456

Publisher

BIRKHAUSER VERLAG AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00033-006-0066-5

Keywords

hydrodynamic stability; Taylor-Couette flow; radial gravity; convection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The stability of circular Couette flow between vertical concentric cylinders in the presence of a radial temperature gradient is considered with an effective radial gravity. In addition to terrestrial buoyancy - rho ge(z) we include the term - rho g(m) f(r)e(r) where g(m) f(r) is the effective gravitational acceleration directed radially inward across the gap. Physically, this body force arises in experiments using ferrofluid in the annular gap of a Taylor-Couette cell whose inner cylinder surrounds a vertical stack of equally spaced disk magnets. The radial dependence f(r) of this force is proportional to the modified Bessel function K-1(kappa r), where 2 pi/kappa is the spatial period of the magnetic stack and r is the radial coordinate. Linear stability calculations made to compare with conditions reported by Ali and Weidman (J. Fluid Mech., 220, 1990) show strong destabilization effects, measured by the onset Rayleigh number R, when the inner wall is warmer, and strong stabilization effects when the outer wall is warmer, with increasing values of the dimensionless radial gravity gamma = g(m)/g. Further calculations presented for the geometry and fluid properties of a terrestrial laboratory experiment reveal a hitherto unappreciated structure of the stability problem for differentially-heated cylinders: multiple wavenumber minima exist in the marginal stability curves. Transitions in global minima among these curves give rise to a competition between differing instabilities of the same spiral mode number, but widely separated axial wavenumbers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available