4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

A study into the risk of exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages 612-618

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-007-0121-3

Keywords

liver cancer; decompensation; liver failure; reactivation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Liver resection is commonly performed for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in well-compensated cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients. Data concerning exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B (ECHB) post-liver resection are scant. To determine the incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of ECHB in patients who underwent hepatic resection for HCC. The methods consisted of a retrospective review of consecutive patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection who had undergone liver resection for HCC from January 2002 to December 2004. Seventy-seven patients underwent 82 liver resections; the mean age was 58.0 +/- 12.1 years; 87% male; 20% hepatitis B e-antigen positive. Incidence of all causes of postoperative hepatitis was 25.6% ( n= 21), and ECHB was 8.5% ( n= 7). Both groups had their peak alanine aminotransferases, 231.0 IU/L ( 74 - 1,400) and 312 IU/L ( 147 - 1,400), respectively, observed at day 84 postresection. Three patients died as a result of ECHB within 4 months postsurgery. One- and 2-year survival rates were poorest for the ECHB group at 42.9 and 21.4%, compared with those with postoperative hepatitis due to other causes at 60.3 and 45.2% and those without postoperative hepatitis at 87.7 and 73.5% ( p < 0.001). Liver resection for HCC in patients with chronic HBV infection carries a risk for ECHB, and affected patients have poorer clinical outcomes. There is a need for close monitoring of these patients preoperatively and in the early postoperative period.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available