4.2 Review

Xenograft use in reconstructive pelvic surgery: a review of the literature

Journal

INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages 555-563

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-006-0288-2

Keywords

biomaterial; dermal collagen; uterine; prolapse; reconstructive surgical procedures; small-intestine submucosa; surgical mesh; heterologous; transplantation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Xenografts, bovine or porcine acellular collagen bioprostheses derived from dermis, pericardium, or small-intestine submucosa, were introduced to overcome synthetic mesh-related complications. Although there are eight commercially available xenografts, there is a paucity of empiric information to justify their use instead of the use of synthetic grafts. In addition, limited data are available about which graft characteristics are important and whether graft-reinforced repairs reduce recurrences and improve outcomes. To address these knowledge gaps, we conducted a Medline search of published reports on xenografts in animal and human trials. Histologic host response to implanted xenograft material depends primarily on chemical cross-linking and porosity, and it is limited to four responses: resorption, incorporation, encapsulation, and mixed. No clinical data unequivocally demonstrate an improved benefit to graft-reinforced repair.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available