4.7 Article

Echocardiographic measures of acute haemodynamic response after cardiac resynchronization therapy predict long-term clinical outcome

Journal

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 28, Issue 9, Pages 1143-1148

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm050

Keywords

dP/dt; resynchronization; Doppler; long-term outcome; cardiomyopathy; heart failure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims Although acute haemodynamic improvement in response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is reflective of a favourable cardiac contractile response, there is limited information regarding not only its ability to predict long-term clinical outcome but also ca rdi ac -substrate -specific differences in the prognostic value of this measure. Methods and results Fifty-three heart failure patients (69 +/- 11 years) with low left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) (22 +/- 6%), wide QRS (169 +/- 31 ms), and indications for CRT were included. There were no significant differences in age, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, medications, QRS width, or LVEF between ischaemic (n = 37) and non-ischaemic (n = 16) groups. Echocardiograms were performed within 24 h of implantation with device OFF and ON. Acute haemodynamic response was measured as LV dP/dt derived from the CW Doppler of mitral regurgitation. Percentage change in dP/dt was used to classify patients: high- (HR: Delta dP/dt > 25%) or poor-responders (PR: Delta dP/dt < 25%). Clinical response to CRT was defined by a combined endpoint of hospitalizations and at[-cause mortality at 12 months. HR group had a significantly better outcome compared to the PR group (P-value = 0.004) irrespective of the aetiology of the cardiomyopathy. Conclusion Echocardiographic assessment of the acute haemodynamic response to CRT predicts longterm clinical outcome in both ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available