Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages 43-47Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2007.02.003
Keywords
HIV; drug resistance; transmission; therapy response
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: Resistance testing has been implemented into clinical guidelines as it has shown some beneficial effect on subsequent therapy response. Case report: Routine population-based genotypic resistance testing for a newly diagnosed HIV-1 patient revealed the presence of resistance mutations M41L, V179D and T215E within reverse transcriptase and no mutations within protease. Four weeks after initiation of the combination tenofovir + lamivudine + efavirenz, no response was observed despite good adherence to therapy and efavirenz drug levels in the therapeutic range. Retrospective single genome sequencing of the baseline sample revealed the presence of minority viral variants with additional mutations: a mutation conferring resistance to lamivudine (M184IV), a thymidine associated mutation (K219R) and mutations possibly associated with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase resistance (F227S, M230IV). Conclusions: This case illustrates that undetected drug-resistant minority variants can reduce the efficacy of a normally very potent first-line regimen tenofovir + lamivudine + efavirenz. The presence of drug-resistance mutations at diagnosis should be considered as a warning sign against the use of low genetic barrier drugs in first-line regimens, even when these drugs are considered to be active according to routine resistance testing. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available