4.2 Article

Barriers to the provision of smoking cessation services reported by clinicians in underserved communities

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages 272-279

Publisher

AMER BOARD FAMILY MEDICINE
DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2007.03.060115

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [5P20RR11104] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCCDPHP CDC HHS [5U48/DP000049] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: This qualitative study describes barriers to the provision of smoking cessation services among primary care providers serving medically underserved populations in the state of Georgia. Methods: Eighty-two health care professionals, including clinicians, nurses, administrators, and support staff, participated in 10 focus groups. All sessions were audiotaped and transcribed. A line-by-line analysis of each transcript was conducted. Results: Barriers were grouped into 5 major themes: lack of time, patient unreadiness to change, inadequate patient resources, inadequate provider resources, and inadequate cessation clinical skills. Within this framework, a number of barriers were identified that are of special importance when caring for the underserved. Examples included the tendency of patients to present in crisis rather than on an appointment basis; patients' inability to pay out-of-pocket expenses for drug therapy; patients' inability to take time from work for cessation services; limited prescribing authority for clinicians in certain settings; inadequate availability of patient education materials, especially non-English materials; and the need for additional training in smoking cessation for providers. Conclusion: Safety net providers encounter barriers to providing smoking cessation services that are similar to barriers faced by clinicians serving more affluent and nonminority populations, but also encounter additional barriers that apply most particularly to the underserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available