4.6 Article

cAMP microdomains and L-type Ca2+ channel regulation in guinea-pig ventricular myocytes

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
Volume 580, Issue 3, Pages 765-776

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.124891

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL068170] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many different receptors can stimulate cAMP synthesis in the heart, but not all elicit the same functional responses. For example, it has been recognized for some time that prostaglandins such as PGE1 increase cAMP production and activate PKA, but they do not elicit responses like those produced by beta-adrenergic receptor (beta AR) agonists such as isoproterenol (isoprenaline), even though both stimulate the same signalling pathway. In the present study, we confirm that isoproterenol, but not PGE1, is able to produce cAMP-dependent stimulation of the L-type Ca2+ current in guinea pig ventricular myocytes. This is despite finding evidence that these cells express EP4 prostaglandin receptors, which are known to activate Gs-dependent signalling pathways. Using fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based biosensors that are either freely diffusible or bound to A kinase anchoring proteins, we demonstrate that the difference is due to the ability of isoproterenol to stimulate cAMP production in cytosolic and caveolar compartments of intact cardiac myocytes, while PGE1 only stimulates cAMP production in the cytosolic compartment. Unlike other receptor-mediated responses, compartmentation of PGE1 responses was not due to concurrent activation of a Gi-dependent signalling pathway or phosphodiesterase activity. Instead, compartmentation of the PGE1 response in cardiac myocytes appears to be due to transient stimulation of cAMP in a microdomain that can communicate directly with the bulk cytosolic compartment but not the caveolar compartment associated with beta AR regulation of L-type Ca 2+ channel function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available