4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

VEGF165 and bFGF protein-based therapy in a slow release system to improve angiogenesis in a bioartificial dermal substitute in vitro and in vivo

Journal

LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY
Volume 392, Issue 3, Pages 305-314

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-007-0194-1

Keywords

angiogenesis; protein-based therapy; VEGF(165) and bFGF; slow release system; matrix vascularisation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Angiogenesis can be enhanced by several growth factors, like vascular endothelial growth factor-165 (VEGF(165)) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF). Delayed release of such growth factors could be provided by incorporation of growth factors in fibrin matrices. In this study, we present a slow release system for VEGF(165) and bFGF in fibrin sealant. Materials and methods In vitro: Pieces of Integra (TM) matrix of 15 mm in diameter were prepared. Integra (TM) matrices were divided into four groups (A=control; B=fibrin sealant; C=fibrin sealant+growth factors; D=growth factors). In vivo: The bioartificial dermal templates were transplanted into a full-skin defect of the back of nu-nu mice. Four different groups included each six matrices at 2 and 4 weeks. Results In vitro: In groups C and D, continuous release of VEGF(165) and bFGF was eminent. The incorporation of growth factors into fibrin sealant evoked a prolonged growth factor release (p < 0.05). In vivo: A significantly higher amount of vessels was quantified in groups C and D compared to groups A and B (p < 0.001). Conclusions A model of slow protein release by combining VEGF(165) and bFGF with fibrin sealant was produced. This model resulted in a prolonged bioavailability of growth factors in vivo for functional purposes. Fibrin and collagen can release growth factors in vivo and induce significant and faster neovascularisation in bioartificial dermal templates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available