4.7 Article

Particulate air pollution, progression, and survival after myocardial infarction

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
Volume 115, Issue 5, Pages 769-775

Publisher

US DEPT HEALTH HUMAN SCIENCES PUBLIC HEALTH SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.9201

Keywords

air pollution; epidemiology; heart diseases; myocardial infarction; survival

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: Several studies have examined the effect of particulate pollution (PM) on survival in general populations, but less is known about susceptible groups. Moreover, previous cohort studies have been cross-sectional and subject to confounding by uncontrolled differences between cities. DESIGN: We investigated whether PM was associated with progression of disease or reduced survival in a study of 196,000 persons from 21 U.S. cities discharged alive following an acute myocardial infarction (MI), using within-city between-year exposure to PM. We constructed city-specific cohorts of survivors of acute MI using Medicare data between 1985 and 1999, and defined three outcomes on follow-up: death, subsequent MI, and a first admission for congestive heart failure (CHF). Yearly averages of PM10 (particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter < 10 mu m) were merged to the individual annual follow-up in each city. We applied Cox's proportional hazard regression model in each city, with adjustment for individual risk factors. In the second stage of the analysis, the city-specific results were combined using a meta-regression. RESULTS: We found significant associations with a hazard ratio for the sum of the distributed lags of 1.3 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2-1.51 for mortality, a hazard ratio of 1.4 (95% CI, 1.2-1.7) for a hospitalization for CHF, and a hazard ratio of 1.4 (95% CI, 1.1-1.8) for a new hospitalization for NIT per 10 pg/m(3) PM10. CONCLUSIONS. This is the first long-term study showing a significant association between particle exposure and adverse post-MI outcomes in persons who survived an MI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available