4.8 Article

Pd catalysis on dendronized solid support: Generation effects and the influence of the backbone structure

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 129, Issue 18, Pages 5860-5869

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja065265d

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies revealed that catalysts, prepared on dendronized support, frequently exhibit enhanced activity and selectivity as compared to their non-dendronized analogues. Regretfully, in early studies of the supported dendritic catalysis, no particular attention was paid to the coordinative nature of the dendritic backbone. In this study, we functionalized Wang polystyrene support with three types of dendritic templates: poly(aril benzyl ether), poly(aryl benzyl thioether), and poly(aryl benzyl amine). These dendronized resins were further decorated with phosphine ligands on the periphery and complexed with a Pd(0) catalytic precursor. The catalysis of the Heck and Suzuki reactions of bromobenzene with the first to third generation supported dendritic catalysts was examined and compared to that of the non-dendritic analogues. All of the examined reactions revealed a positive dendritic effect, reflected in up to 5-fold increase in yield, in the most prominent case. The reasons for the observed effect are the proximity of the ligating sites translated into reduced cross-linking and, probably, the increased distance of the catalyst from the polymer matrix. We proved, however, that the latter could not be achieved with a linear spacer. Although the Suzuki reaction was rather insensitive to the backbone structure, the Heck reaction catalysis at 80 degrees C exhibited substantial sensitivity to the nature of the dendritic backbone, with the polyether structure demonstrating the best outcome. This is the first demonstration of the influence of the coordinative ability of the backbone on the activity of a supported dendritic catalyst.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available