4.7 Article

Analysis of molecular pathways in sporadic neuroendocrine tumors of the gastro-entero-pancreatic system

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 120, Issue 10, Pages 2157-2164

Publisher

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.22569

Keywords

neuroendocrine tumors; microsatellite instability; loss of heterozygosity; CpG island methylation; promoter methylation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Little is known about the molecular pathogenesis of neuroendocrine tumors (NET) of the gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) system. We analyzed genetic and epigenetic alterations as well as the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP). The study comprised 118 well-differentiated fore- and mid-gut GEP-NET from 71 patients. In addition to loss of heterozygosity (LOH), microsatellite instability (MSI) and the methylation status of various tumor associated genes were examined. The expression profile of p16, APC and MENIN was investigated by immunohistochemistry. None of the tumors was highly microsatellite unstable, LOH was found in 22.2%. Significant differences in promoter hypermethylation were identified in the RUNX3 and the O-6-MGMT genes. We found a significant loss of p16 expression in insulinomas (p = 0.05) and functional NET (p = 0.01), respectively. APC was expressed less in gastrinomas (p = 0.01) and functional GEP-NET (p = 0.05) vs. nonfunctional tumors. MENIN expression was reduced in pancreatic vs. extrapancreatic NET (p = 0.008) and in insulinomas vs. nonfunctional GEP-NET (p = 0.019) and NET associated with the carcinoid syndrome (p = 0.029). Further CIMP and a Ki-67 index > 10% showed a close correlation. Outcome analysis of 19 patients showed a better survival for CIMP-negative patients. The analyses identified significant genetic and epigenetic alterations in well-differentiated fore- and mid-gut NET. CIMP, similar to Ki-67, might turn out to be of prognostic relevance. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available