4.8 Article

Investigations of direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) fading mechanisms

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 167, Issue 2, Pages 358-365

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.02.020

Keywords

direct methanol fuel cell; fading mechanism; Ru dissolution; X-ray absorption spectroscopy; Nafion degradation; gas diffusion layer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this report, we present the microscopic investigations on various fading mechanisms of a direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC). High energy X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), and Raman spectroscopic analysis were applied to a membrane-electrode-assembly (MEA) before and after fuel cell operation to figure out the various factors causing its fading. High energy XRD analysis of the fresh and faded MEA revealed that the agglomeration of the catalyst particles in the cathode layer of the faded MEA was more significant than in the anode layer of the faded MEA. The XAS analysis demonstrated that the alloying extent of Pt (J(Pt)) and Ru (J(Ru)) in the anode catalyst was increased and decreased, respectively, from the fresh to the faded MEA, indicating that the Ru environment in the anode catalyst was significantly changed after the fuel cell operation. Based on the X-ray absorption edge jump measurements at the Ru K-edge on the anode catalyst of the fresh and the faded MEA it was found that Ru was dissolved from the Pt-Ru catalyst after the fuel cell operation. Both the Ru K-edge XAS and EDX analysis on the cathode catalyst layer of the faded MEA confirms the presence of Ru environment in the cathode catalyst due to the Ru crossover from the anode to the cathode side. The changes in the membrane and the gas diffusion layer (GDL) after the fuel cell operation were observed from the Raman spectroscopy analysis. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available