4.8 Article

Synthesis of molecular brushes by grafting onto method: Combination of ATRP and click reactions

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 129, Issue 20, Pages 6633-6639

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja0711617

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Molecular brushes (densely grafted polymers or bottle-brush macromolecules) were synthesized by the grafting onto method via combination of atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) and click reactions. Linear poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) polymers were synthesized first by ATRP. After esterification reactions between pentynoic acid and the hydroxyl side groups, polymeric backbones with alkynyl side groups on essentially every monomer unit (PHEMA-alkyne) were obtained. Five kinds of azido-terminated polymeric side chains (SCs) with different chemical compositions and molecular weights were used, including poly(ethylene glycol)-N-3 (PEO-N-3), polystyrene-N-3, poly(n-butyl acrylate)-N-3, and poly(n-butyl acrylate)-b-polystyrene-N-3. All click coupling reactions between alkyne-containing polymeric backbones (PHEMA-alkyne) and azido-terminated polymeric SCs were completed within 3 h. The grafting density of the obtained molecular brushes was affected by several factors, including the molecular weights and the chemical structures of the linear SCs, as well as the initial molar ratio of linear chains to alkynyl groups. When linear polymers with thinner structure and lower molecular weight, e.g., PEO-N-3 with M-n = 775 g/mol, were reacted with PHEMA-alkyne (degree of polymerization = 210) at a high molar ratio of linear chains to alkynyl groups in the backbone, the brush copolymers with the highest grafting density were obtained (Y-grafting = 88%). This result indicates that the average number of SCs was ca. 186 per brush molecule and the average molecular weight of the brush molecules was ca. 190 kg/mol.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available