4.5 Article

Large parallel electric fields, currents, and density cavities in dispersive Alfven waves above the aurora

Journal

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2006JA012007

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

[1] Large parallel electric fields (E-parallel to > 10 mV/m) are sometimes observed with intense filamentary field-aligned currents (J(parallel to) > 10 mu A/m(2) mapped to 100-km altitude) on transverse scales where k(x)c/omega(pe) approximate to 1 above the auroral oval. The ratio of the transverse electric (E-x) and magnetic field (B-y) variations is approximately the local Alfven speed and increases with decreasing transverse scale in a manner consistent with inertial Alfven wave dispersion. These fields are typically observed in association with density cavities. Statistically, it is shown that the depth of the cavities observed over the altitude range from 350 to 4175 km by the Fast Auroral Snapshot (FAST) satellite typically lies between 30 and 50% of the background plasma with 90% depletions being observed for 1% of the recorded events. The wave currents embedded within these cavities exceed 100 mu A/m(2) for 2% of the ensemble and are typically found over transverse widths of similar to 2 pi lambda(e). Using a fluid description of the plasma, we show statistically that electron pressure gradients provide a probable means for balancing the large E-parallel to found in these structures with a likely but unknown contribution from anomalous resistivity. Furthermore, we find that the ratio of the average drift speed of the bulk electron plasma (v(d)) to the electron thermal speed (v(e)) inside these structures is v(d)/v(e) >= 0.1 and that in at least 2% of cases veh05(d)/v(e) >= 1.0. On the basis of recent simulation results and the Bohm criterion for double layer formation, these statistics indicate that the large E-parallel to sometimes observed in density cavities may occur in double layers driven by the Alfven wave current.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available