4.7 Article

Upper mantle seismic velocities and anisotropy in China determined through Pn and Sn tomography

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH
Volume 112, Issue B5, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2006JB004409

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

[1] We have obtained velocity images of the uppermost mantle beneath China by performing tomographic inversion of both Pn and Sn traveltimes. From the Annual Bulletin of Chinese Earthquakes, 99,139 Pn arrivals and 43,646 Sn arrivals were selected. Pn anisotropy was also obtained simultaneously with Pn velocity. Average Pn and Sn velocities are 8.05 and 4.55 km/s, respectively, and maximum velocity perturbations are about 3 - 4%. The Pn and Sn velocities are low in eastern China and high in western China. Particularly high velocities are associated with old basins ( for example, Tarim, Junggar, Turpan-Hami, Qaidam, and Sichuan) and stable craton ( for example, Ordos). Low Sn velocities are found mainly throughout North China. In addition, velocities are relatively low beneath the central Tibetan Plateau and the North-South Seismic Zone ( along 103 degrees E). In Tarim and central China where we observe strong anisotropy, the fast Pn velocity directions are consistent with the directions of maximum principal compressive stress as well as directions of crustal movement determined from Global Positioning System. Beneath the India-Eurasia collision zone, the Pn anisotropy direction is parallel to the collision arc and nearly perpendicular to both the direction of maximum compression and crustal movement resulting from pure shear deformation. Both the velocity variations and anisotropy indicate that the Tibetan Plateau was extruded, and the mantle material beneath the plateau has flowed around the East Himalaya Syntax, while the remaining material has diverted northwestward beneath the Tarim Basin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available