4.5 Article

Cellular localization of mGluR3 and mGluR5 mRNAs in normal and injured rat brain

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 1149, Issue -, Pages 1-13

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.02.041

Keywords

mGluR3 and mGluR5; astrocyte; oligodendrocyte; microglia; brain lesion

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to understand the role of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) in the brain, it is important to know how the mGluRs are differentially expressed among the different cell types. At present, the cellular expression of mGluR3 and mGluR5 has been mostly studied in terms of proteins with observations suggesting the expression of both mGluR3 and mGluR5 in neuronal and in glial cells. in order to verify the brain cell type-expressing mGluR3 and mGluR5 mRNAs, both in normal and injured brain, we performed a double labeling analysis, by in situ hybridization for mGluR3 or mGluR5 mRNA and immunohistochemistry for specific cellular markers. This approach allowed us to find mGluR3 mRNA expressed in neurons (NeuN-positive cells), and in glial cells, such as astrocytes (GFAP-positive cells) and oligodendrocytes (CNPase-positive cells). The same analysis showed that only NeuN-positive cells express mGluR5 mRNA. The time course of mGluR3 mRNA expression in two models of hippocampal formation lesion, kainate-induced seizures or ibotenic acid injection, showed an increased expression of mGluR3 in the area of lesion. This effect appears 1 week after the injury and was localized in GFAP- and CNPase-positive cells. In contrast, mGluR5 was not found expressed in the area of lesion. The present results contribute to extend available data on cell type-expressing mGluR3 and mGluR5 in normal and injured brain and could be relevant to understand the mechanisms that drive neuronglial cells interaction both in normal and repairing processes. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available