4.4 Article

Progression of carotid artery intima-media thickening in HIV-infected and uninfected adults

Journal

AIDS
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages 1137-1145

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32811ebf79

Keywords

intima-media thickness; carotid artery; protease inhibitors; HIV

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [K24 AI 56933, U01 AI 27660] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To compare the rate of change in intima-media thickness (IMT) of the carotid artery among uninfected subjects and HIV-infected subjects receiving or not receiving protease inhibitor (PI) regimens over a 144 week period. Design: This prospective, matched cohort study enrolled 133 subjects into 45 triads (groups of three subjects matched by age, sex, race/ethnicity, smoking status, blood pressure, and menopause) from university based outpatient HIV clinics. Each triad consisted of one subject from each of the following groups: 1, HIV-infected subjects with continuous use of PI therapy for >= 2 years; 2, HIV-infected subjects without prior PI use; 3, HIV-uninfected subjects. Methods: Standardized ultrasound images of carotid IMT were collected at weeks 0, 2, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 144. The main outcome was the yearly progression rate of carotid IMT (mm/year). Results: The median yearly IMT progression rate in groups 1, 2, and 3 was 0.0096, 0.0058, and 0.0085 mm/year, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in progression between groups 1 and 2, or between the combined HIV-positive groups and the HIV-negative control group. A multicovariate model examining predictors of progression in carotid IMT among all subjects contained low density lipoprotein cholesterol and homocysteine. Among HIV subjects, predictors included nadir CD4 cell count and ritonavir use. Conclusions: HIV infection and PI use did not contribute substantially to the rate of carotid IMT progression in our matched study. (C) 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available