4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Structural and chemical transformations in SnS thin films used in chemically deposited photovoltaic cells

Journal

THIN SOLID FILMS
Volume 515, Issue 15, Pages 5771-5776

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2006.12.078

Keywords

chemical deposition; tin sulfide; thin films; photovoltaic structures

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chemically deposited SnS thin films possess p-type electrical conductivity. We report a photovoltaic structure: SnO2:F-CdS-SnS-(CuS)silver print, with V-oc>300 mV and J(sc) up to 5 mA/cm(2) under 850 W/m(2) tungsten halogen illumination. Here, SnO2:F is a commercial spray-CVD (Pilkington TEC-8) coating, and the rest deposited from different chemical baths: US (80 nm) at 333 K, SnS (450 nm) and CuS (80 nm) at 293303 K. The structure may be heated in nitrogen at 573 K, before applying the silver print. The photovoltaic behavior of the structure varies with 2 heating: V-oc approximate to 400 mV and J(sc) <1 mA/cm(2) when heated at 423 K in air, but V-oc decreases and J(sc) increases when heated at higher temperatures. These photovoltaic structures have been found to be stable over a period extending over one year by now. The overall cost of materials, simplicity of the deposition process, and possibility of easily varying the parameters to improve the cell characteristics inspire further work. Here we report two different baths for the deposition of SnS thin films of about 500 nm by chemical deposition. There is a considerable difference in the nature of growth, crystalline structure and chemical stability of these films under air-heating at 623-823 K or while heating SnS-CuS layers, evidenced in XRF and grazing incidence angle XRD studies. Heating of SnS-CuS films results in the formation of SnS-CuxSnS,, 'All-chemically deposited photovoltaic structures' involving these materials are presented. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available