4.5 Article

Human keratinocyte induction of rapid effector function in antigen-specific memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cells

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages 1485-1493

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/eji.200636915

Keywords

antigen presentation; keratinocytes; skin

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [G116/150, MC_U137881017, MC_U137884185] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_U137881017, MC_U137884185, G116/150] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. MRC [MC_U137884185, MC_U137881017, G116/150] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ability of human keratinocytes to present antigen to T cells is controversial and, indeed, it has been suggested that keratinocytes may promote T cell hyporesponsiveness. Furthermore, it is unclear whether keratinocytes can process antigen prior to MHC class I and class II presentation. We tested the ability of keratinocytes to induce functional responses in epitope-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) memoryTcells usingpeptides, protein and recombinant expression vectors as sources of antigen. Keratinocytes were able to efficiently process and present protein antigen to CD4+ T cells, resulting in cytokine secretion (Th1 and Th2). This interaction was dependent on keratinocyte expression of HLA class II and ICAM-1, which could be induced by IFN-7. In addition, keratinocytes could present virally encoded or exogenous peptide to CD8(+) T cells resulting in T cell cytokine production and target cell lysis. Finally, T cell lines grown using keratinocytes as stimulators showed no loss of function. These findings demonstrate that keratinocytes are able to efficiently process and present antigen to CD4(+) and CD8(+) memory T cells and induce functional responses. The findings have broad implications for the pathogenesis of cutaneous disease and for transcutaneous drug or vaccine delivery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available