4.2 Article

rTMS over the intraparietal sulcus disrupts numerosity processing

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 179, Issue 4, Pages 631-642

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0820-0

Keywords

numerical cognition; rTMS; parietal lobe; numerosity; distance effect

Categories

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [K24RR018875] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NEI NIH HHS [R01-EY12091] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NHLBI NIH HHS [K30 HL04095-03] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIBIB NIH HHS [R01-EB 00,5047] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NIDCD NIH HHS [R01-DC05672] Funding Source: Medline
  6. NINDS NIH HHS [R01-NS 20,068, R01-NS 47,754] Funding Source: Medline
  7. Wellcome Trust [073537] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It has been widely argued that the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) is involved in tasks that evoke representations of numerical magnitude, among other cognitive functions. However, the causal role of this parietal region in processing symbolic and non-symbolic numerosity has not been established. The current study used repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) to the left and right IPS to investigate the effects of temporary deactivations of these regions on the capacity to represent symbolic (Arabic numbers) and non-symbolic (arrays of dots) numerosities. We found that comparisons of both symbolic and non-symbolic numerosities were impaired after rTMS to the left IPS but enhanced by rTMS to the right IPS. A signature effect of numerical distance was also found: greater impairment (or lesser facilitation) when comparing numerosities of similar magnitude. The reverse pattern of impairment and enhancement was found in a control task that required judging an analogue stimulus property (ellipse orientation) but no numerosity judgements. No rTMS effects for the numerosity tasks were found when stimulating an area adjacent but distinct from the IPS, the left and right angular gyrus. These data suggest that left IPS is critical for processing symbolic and non-symbolic numerosity; this processing may thus depend on common neural mechanisms, which are distinct from mechanisms supporting the processing of analogue stimulus properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available