4.7 Article

Use of X-ray absorption spectroscopy and biochemical techniques to characterize arsenic uptake and reduction in pea (Pisum sativum) plants

Journal

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 45, Issue 6-7, Pages 457-463

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2007.03.010

Keywords

peas; arsenic; amylase; X-ray absorption spectroscopy; phytoremediation

Categories

Funding

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [R01 ES 11367-01] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [S06 GM 8012-33] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Arsenite (As(111)) and arsenate (As(V)) uptake by peas was investigated using inductively coupled plasma/optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) at pH below 4 and at pH 5.8. Additionally, total amylolitic activity and oc-amylase (1,4-alpha-D-glucan glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.1) activity was assayed in plants exposed to arsenic treatments. At pH below 4, the uptake for As(111) and As(V) in roots was 137 and 124 mg As kg(-1) dry weight (d wt), respectively. Translocation of arsenic to the aerial part was relatively low (similar to 5 mg As kg(-1) d wt). The uptake for As(111) and As(V) in roots at pH 5.8 was about 43 and 30 mg As kg-1 d wt, respectively, and translocation of As to the aerial part was not detectable. None of the arsenic treatments affected the total amylolitic activity in roots; however, the shoots from all treatments showed an increase in the total amylolitic activity. Alpha-amylase activity in the pea leaves was not significantly affected by arsenic treatments. X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) studies showed a reduction of As(V) to As(111) in the roots. From linear combination X-ray absorption near edge structure (LC-XANES) fittings, it was determined that arsenic was present as a mixture of As(111) oxide and sulfide in pea roots. (C) 2007 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available