4.6 Article

Evaluation of lung maturity by amniotic fluid analysis in equine neonate

Journal

THERIOGENOLOGY
Volume 67, Issue 9, Pages 1455-1462

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.02.013

Keywords

fetal lung maturity; amniotic fluid; lecithin/sphingomyelin; lamellar body count; chromatography

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to gather useful new data for evaluation of lung maturity in the neonatal foal. Because equine neonatal intensive therapy is very expensive, a precocious diagnosis could help to express a prognosis and to offer a respiratory support early after birth, increasing the survival rate and reducing complications. Amniotic fluid was collected at parturition on n = 18 mares. Lamellar bodies were isolated in the amniotic fluid and measured with transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Furthermore two tests on amniotic fluid that are commonly used in humane medicine were utilized: lecithin/sphingomyelin ratio (L/S) and lamellar body count (LBC). US ratio was determined using thin layer chromatography (TLC) and, for the first time in equine amniotic fluid, with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). LBC was performed with an automated blood cell counter. The mean of the US ratio obtained in mature foals was 2.5 with TLC and 2.7 with HPLC. The mean LBC in the same group was 48 x 10(3)/mu L. The Spearman's Rank correlation test found a significant correlation between TLC and Apgar score (R = 0.66, p < 0.01), between TLC and cord pH (R = 0.65, p < 0.05), between HPLC and Apgar score (R = 0.63, p < 0.01) and between cord pH and Apgar score (R = 0.82, p < 0.01). The Student's t-test did not found a significant difference between US ratio performed with TLC and with HPLC. These methods may be useful for evaluation of lung maturity in the equine species, but further studies on a large number of mature and premature foals are necessary to establish equine pulmonary maturity standards. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available