4.2 Article

Expressions of Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin in Gastric Cancer: A Potential Biomarker for Prognosis and an Ancillary Diagnostic Test

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ar.21230

Keywords

NGAL; gastric cancer; neoplasm invasiveness; neoplasm metastasis; diagnosis

Funding

  1. Zhejiang Province Nature Science Foundation of China [Y207763]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Program for the Cultivation of High-level Innovative Health Talents

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to explore the clinical significance of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) in the development and prognosis of gastric cancer. NGAL tumor levels were determined in 333 GC patients by immunohistochemistry. NGAL in blood samples from 63 healthy donors and 60 gastric cancer patients were also determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Rate of NGAL expression was correlated with the size of tumor (69.3% in >4 cm tumors vs. 46.1% in <= 4 cm tumors), Lauren's classification (84.3% in diffuse type vs. 28.2% in intestinal type), lymph node metastasis (75.6% vs. 16.4% with no metastasis), vascular invasion (74.9% vs. 26.8% with no invasion), distant metastasis (94.3% vs. 50.3% with no distant metastasis), and TNM stage (81.8% in TNM III+IV vs. 20.5% in TNM I+II). NGAL expression can be used as an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer as indicated by multivariate analysis. Positivity for serum NGAL was higher than that for carbohydrate antigen determinant, CA19-9 (38.1% vs. 12.5%) in TNM I, and higher than that for carcinoembryonic antigen, CEA (58.3% vs. 8.3%) and CA19-9 (58.3% vs. 8.3%) in TNM II. In conclusion, serum NGAL has great potential to be used as an ancillary test for diagnosis of gastric cancer. Increased expression of NGAL in tumors suggests gastric cancer is likely to be at an advanced stage with invasion and metastasis, and also poor prognosis. Anat Rec, 293:1855-1863, 2010. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available