4.5 Article

Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α correlates with MET and metastasis in node-negative breast cancer

Journal

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages 167-175

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-006-9360-3

Keywords

breast cancer; HIF-1 alpha; hypoxia; MET; metastasis; node-negative

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mechanism of tumor hypoxia promoting metastasis remains uncertain. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1 alpha) is a key mediator of the cellular response to hypoxia and binds the met promoter, resulting in increased expression of MET. In breast cancer, MET overexpression is associated with death caused by metastatic disease. Aim of this study is to investigate the role of HIF-1 alpha in MET expression and metastasis in lymph node negative breast cancer. We recruited a homogeneous cohort of 104 patients with T1-2N0M0 breast carcinoma, who had undergone primary surgery. Fifty-three patients had distant metastases and 51 patients had no evidence of disease for more than 10 years. We analyzed the expressions of HIF-1 alpha and MET in these patients using immunohistochemistry. HIF-1 alpha and MET were positively correlated (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, 0.35; P < 0.01), were independent predictors of distant metastasis (P = 0.002 and P = 0.03, respectively), and correlated with poor 10-year disease-free survival rate (P < 0.001 for both). Furthermore, co-overexpression of HIF-1 alpha and MET was a significant independent predictor of distant metastasis (odd radio, 10.78; P < 0.001), and patients with co-overexpression had a significantly worse 10-year disease-free survival rate. The results provide evidence that tumor hypoxia promotes metastasis through the induction of MET overexpression by HIF-1 alpha and emphasize the promising status of HIF-1 alpha as a therapeutic target against metastasis in node-negative breast cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available