4.2 Article

Ontogeny of skeletal maturation in the juvenile rat

Publisher

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/ar.20650

Keywords

skeletal maturation; DXA; endochondral mineralization; endochondral elongation; osteocalcin; TRAP5b; bone density

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA 83892] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Systemic regulation of the cellular processes that produce endochondral elongation and endochondral mineralization during postnatal skeletal maturation are not completely understood. In particular, a mechanism coupling the decline of cellular activity in the bone microenvironment to the onset of sexual maturity remains elusive. The purpose of this study was to empirically integrate the dynamic progression of bone mineral accrual and endochondral elongation as a function of animal age in growing male and female Sprague-Dawley rats. We used serial dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and radiography to study the temporal progression of bone growth and mineral accrual from weaning to adulthood. We observed that skeletal maturation proceeds in a pattern adequately described by the Gompertz function. During this period of growth, we found that serum markers of osteoblastic bone formation declined with age, while osteoclastic bone resorption activity remained unchanged. We also report a slight lag in the age at inflection in the rate of bone mineral accrual relative to the rate of tibial elongation and that both endochondral processes eventually come to asymptotic equilibrium by approximately 20 weeks of age. In addition, we studied tibial growth plate histomorphometry at select time points through 1 year of age. We report that, despite the histologic persistence of physeal cartilage, very little proliferative or elongative activity was measured in this tissue beyond 20 weeks of age. Taken together, these data provide insight to the temporal coordination of postnatal endochondral growth processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available