4.4 Article

Regional travel-time uncertainty and seismic location improvement using a three-dimensional a priori velocity model

Journal

BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
Volume 97, Issue 3, Pages 804-825

Publisher

SEISMOLOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1785/0120060079

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We demonstrate our ability to improve regional travel-time prediction and seismic event location accuracy using an a priori 3D velocity model of Western Eurasia and North Africa (WENA1.0). Travel-time residuals are assessed relative to the iasp91 model for approximately 6000 Pg, Pn, and P arrivals, from seismic events having 2 sigma epicenter accuracy between 1 km and 25 km (ground truth 1 [GTI] and GT25, respectively), recorded at 39 stations throughout the model region. Ray paths range in length between 0 degrees and 40 degrees (local, regional, and near teleseismic) providing depth sounding that spans the crust and upper mantle. The dataset also provides representative geographic sampling across Eurasia and North Africa including aseismic areas. The WENALO model markedly improves travel-time predictions for most stations with an average variance reduction of 29% for all ray paths from the GT25 events; when we consider GT5 and better events alone, the variance reduction is 49%. For location tests we use 196 geographically distributed GT5 and better events. In 134 cases (68% of the events), locations are improved, and average mislocation is reduced from 24.9 km to 17.7 km. We develop a travel-time uncertainty model that is used to calculate location coverage ellipses. The coverage ellipses for WENA1.0 are validated to be representative of epicenter error and are smaller than those for iasp91 by 37%. We conclude that a priori models are directly applicable where data coverage limits tomographic and empirical approaches, and the development of the uncertainty model enables merging of a priori and data-driven approaches using Bayesian techniques.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available