4.6 Article

Fault slip in the 1997 Manyi, Tibet earthquake from linear elastic modelling of InSAR displacements

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL
Volume 169, Issue 3, Pages 988-1008

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03318.x

Keywords

earthquake; elastic dislocation; InSAR; modelling; rheology; Tibet

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [come10001] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. NERC [come10001] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The M-w 7.6 1997 Manyi earthquake occurred in an area of central northern Tibet where sparse vegetation coverage and a lack of human habitation provide excellent conditions for Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) studies. We use coseismic pairs of radar images acquired by the ESA ERS-2 satellite to construct interferograms of the surface displacement field due to the earthquake. The location and extent of the coseismic fault rupture are mapped using a combination of optical satellite imagery, high-resolution digital topography, interferometric correlation and azimuth offset measurements; in so doing, we are able to relate prominent geomorphic features in the fault zone to bends in the fault. Using elastic dislocation models consistent with this mapped fault trace, we then test a range of fault geometries and slip conditions to find the combination which best explains the InSAR displacements. Our favoured model contains a reversal in fault dip, approximately halfway along its length, occurring at the location of a restraining bend. Slip on this model fault is heterogeneous, with two areas of peak slip of 7 m or greater, and components of dip-slip displacement which vary significantly along-strike. The success of this model in fitting the data implies that an observed asymmetry in the coseismic interferograms can be explained in terms of the local fault geometry, rather than by using non-linear elastic rheologies as suggested by earlier authors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available