4.7 Article

The calcium-sensing receptor is a target of autoantibodies in patients with autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 1

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Volume 92, Issue 6, Pages 2107-2114

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2006-2466

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context: Autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 1 (APS1) is an autosomal recessive disorder caused by mutations in the autoimmune regulator gene. Hypoparathyroidism occurs in 80% of patients with APS1 and has been suggested to result from an autoimmune reaction against the calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR) on parathyroid cells. However, the detection of CaSR antibodies in APS1 remains controversial, with some studies disputing the relevance of the receptor as an autoantigen. Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze a defined set of APS1 patient sera for the presence of CaSR antibodies using different assay systems. Results: APS1 patients and individuals with other autoimmune disorders along with healthy subjects were tested for antibody binding to the CaSR. In an immunoprecipitation assay with the CaSR expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells, 12 of 14 (85.7%) APS1 and two of 28 (7.1%) Graves' disease patients were considered positive for CaSR antibodies. The prevalence of receptor antibodies was significantly greater than that in the cohort of healthy individuals only in the APS1 patient group (P < 0.0001). In a flow cytometry assay, seven of 14 (50.0%) APS1 patient sera showed binding to the extracellular domain of the CaSR. The prevalence of receptor antibodies in the APS1 patient group was significantly greater than that in the group of healthy controls (P = 0.023). No CaSR antibodies could be detected in any patients or controls using a radiobinding assay. Conclusion: The CaSR is an autoantigen in APS1, but detection of antibodies against the receptor appears to be influenced by the assay system used.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available