4.7 Article

Down-regulation of human telomerase reverse transcriptase through specific activation of RNAi pathway quickly results in cancer cell growth impairment

Journal

BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 73, Issue 11, Pages 1703-1714

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2007.01.035

Keywords

RNA interference; small interfering RNA; telomerase; hTERT; prostate cancer; cell growth

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Targeting of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) by different small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) resulted in a variable degree of telomerase activity inhibition in PC-3 and DU145 prostate cancer cells. In addition, transfection with siRNA5 and siRNA41, which caused high levels (similar to 80 and similar to 55%, respectively) of enzyme activity inhibition in both cell lines, led to a marked reduction of hTERT mRNA and protein expression and a significant inhibition of cell proliferation within a few days, without concomitant telomere shortening or telomeric 3 ' overhang impairment. Such an antiproliferative effect was not ascribable to the activation of non-specific responses, since siRNA5 and siRNA41 did not induce the expression of 2 '-S ' oligoadenylate synthetase-1 and were able to cause a significant growth impairment also in HCT 116 colon cancer cells, which have a defective interferon pathway. Cell growth inhibition was indeed associated with hTERT down-regulation, as it was almost completely rescued in siRNA-treated HCT 116 cells co-transfected with an hTERT-expressing vector. Moreover, siRNA5 and siRNA41 failed to affect the proliferation of hTERT-negative U2-OS osteosarcoma cells. Interestingly, transfection with siRNA5 significantly reduced the tumorigenic and growth potential of PC-3 cells when xenotransplanted into nude mice. Such data suggest siRNA-mediated hTERT down-regulation as an efficient strategy to impair prostate cancer cell growth. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available