4.2 Article

The efficacy of rituximab plus Hyper-CVAD regimen in mantle cell lymphoma is independent of FCγRIIIa and FCγRIIa polymorphisms

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 315-321

Publisher

ESIFT SRL
DOI: 10.1179/joc.2007.19.3.315

Keywords

Hyper-CVAD; mantle cell lymphorna; rituximab

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) accounts for 3-10% of all non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, with median overall survival not exceeding 3-4 years. Rituximab in combination with the Hyper-CVAD regimen appears the most promising regimen; thus, we adopted it as a first-line treatment strategy in a series of 24 patients. In addition to evaluation of clinical success of the regimen, we investigated a possible role of polymorphism in IgG Fc receptors, FC gamma RIIIa and FC gamma RIIa. The frequencies of FC gamma RIIIa-158 were as follows: V/V=4/24 (17%); V/F=16/24 (66%); F/F=4/24 (17%). Those of the FC gamma RIIa-131 polymorphism were H/H=11/24 (46%), H/R=9/24 (37%), R/R=4/24 (17%). The overall response rate was 62.5%, with 33% of complete responses (CRs) after four cycles of R-Hyper-CVAD. Two-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 78% for 158V/V patients vs 75% for cases carrying phenylalanine (p=0.88). When the FC gamma RIIa polymorphism was assessed, the 2-year PFS was 82% for 131H/H patients vs 75% for those carrying arginine (p=0.26). Eighty-three percent of cases achieved Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)-negativity: the progression rate was significantly influenced by the minimal residual disease clearance, with 12% progression in the subgroup of PCR-negative cases versus 67% progression in PCR-positive cases (p=0.008). The achievement of PCR-negativity was not significantly influenced by FC gamma R polymorphisms. Results confirm that rituximab plus Hyper-CVAD is an effective regimen for the induction of prolonged remission in patients with aggressive MCL and suggest that rituximab efficacy is independent of the FC gamma R polymorphisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available